Signature Exclusion Attack
The integrity of all authentication tokens should be protected. In case of SAML, this is realized by a digital signature s = SIG_IdP(t). Signature Exclusion (0Sig) exploits a vulnerability in the verification logic allowing the usage of unsigned tokens. If SAML token does not contain any signature, no protection of integrity or authenticity is provided. Since no digital signature for the token is required, an attacker can generate tokens containing arbitrary identities (I) of other users.
There are no attack subtypes for this attack.
In order for this attack to work the attacker has to have knowledge about the following things:
- Attacker knows endpoint of the web service. otherwise, he is not able to reach the web service.
- Attacker knows that the web service processes the security header and the "signature" element. If the web service does not "expect" an signed part, it just discards the signature and the attack does not work.
The attacked Single Sign-On component is marked in red colour.
The attack is targeted at the Single Sign-On (SSO) Verificator, which should require that the authentication token is signed and verify the applied signature. By this means, the integrity of the authentication token is guaranteed.
The attacker creates authentication tokens containing statements about other users t = (..., I_Alice/I_Bob/I_Admin,...). He then sends the token to an Software-as-a-Service Cloud Provider (SaaS-CP) (Starget) and is logged in with the corresponding identity. Finally, the attacker gains access to arbitrary accounts and their resources.
Mitigation / Countermeasures
SAML messages without signature must not be accepted.
In 2012, Somorovsky et al. applied the Signature Exclusion attack on three SAML frameworks: Apache Axis2, JOSSO and OpenAthens.
In 2014, Mainka et al. analyzed 22 Software as a Service cloud providers and found out that one framework was vulnerable to this attack: Clarizen.
C. Mainka, V. Mladenov, F. Feldmann, J. Krautwald, J. Schwenk (2014): Your Software at my Service: Security Analysis of SaaS Single Sign-On Solutions in the Cloud. In The ACM Cloud Computing Security Workshop (CCSW).
J. Somorovsky, A. Mayer, J. Schwenk, M. Kampmann, M. Jensen: On Breaking SAML: Be Whoever You Want to Be. In Proceedings of the 21st USENIX Security Symposium, 2012.
- Attack Categorisation By Attacker Model: Message generation attacks
- Attack Categorisation By Violated Security Objective Access Control
- Attack Categorisation By Attack on IdP/ SP: Attack on SP
- Attack Categorisation By Attacked Single Sign-On Component Verificator
- Attack Categorisation By Attack Spreading:Conceptual Flaws
- Attack Categorisation By Attack on SAML